Vectasense
Direction. Clarity. Decision.
Book a Diagnostic
← All industries
Industry · Maritime & Shipping

Maritime & Shipping

Vessel, fleet and port-window decisions for owners, managers and liner operators.

Maritime & Shipping · 08

Sanctions & Contractual Risk

Which voyages and counterparties carry sanctions or charter-party risk?

Moves from AIS vessel data and charter parties to risk-ranked flags, so compliance teams see which voyages, vessels and counterparties need attention first. The sample dashboard screens 12 vessels and 34 contracts under monitoring, with 13 open high-risk flags and an average of 2.4 days to resolve a flag.

What you get
  • Composite risk score by vessel
  • High-risk port calls and STS transfers over time
  • Register filtered by signal, including overlooked alerts
  • Actions that flow to the compliance team
  • Duration: 4–6 weeks for an outcome-based POC
Sanctions & Contractual Risk · compliance dashboard · synthetic sample

How the AI works. A risk model combines AIS vessel data and charter-party terms into a composite score, ranks vessels and counterparties, and surfaces overlooked alerts, such as a screening hit left unreviewed in the queue, with the next action attached to every row.

A composite risk score ranks each vessel, and a trend shows high-risk port calls and ship-to-ship transfers over six months. A register filters by signal (critical, elevated, clear, and signals overlooked) and attaches the action to each row: a compliance hold, enhanced due diligence, legal review or escalation. It also surfaces the match that sat unreviewed in the queue, such as a screening hit on a newly onboarded charterer flagged 18 days earlier.